<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Will my strategy be effective in deferring gain recognition on sale of the land?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land</link>
	<description>Classified Ads Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:04:05 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Bibs</title>
		<link>http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land/comment-page-1#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>Bibs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>This deal doesn&#039;t pass the smell test because the corporation is a related party.  I think that there is a strong possibility that:
1.  You would be taxed on the full amount of the gain because the corporation is a related party.
2.  The sale would would be taxed as ordinary income because it was a sale to a related party. (Code Section 1239 (a) ).&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am a CPA,  My source is CCH Para 1744 2008 US Master Tax Guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This deal doesn&#8217;t pass the smell test because the corporation is a related party.  I think that there is a strong possibility that:<br />
1.  You would be taxed on the full amount of the gain because the corporation is a related party.<br />
2.  The sale would would be taxed as ordinary income because it was a sale to a related party. (Code Section 1239 (a) ).<br /><b>References : </b><br />I am a CPA,  My source is CCH Para 1744 2008 US Master Tax Guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William H</title>
		<link>http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land/comment-page-1#comment-6781</link>
		<dc:creator>William H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://oodle.us/land-for-sale/will-my-strategy-be-effective-in-deferring-gain-recognition-on-sale-of-the-land#comment-6781</guid>
		<description>Your basis in the property will be transferred to the note.  As the note is paid off, you would pay the taxes so your strategy will be effective in deferring the gains.

Have you considered performing a 1031 tax deferred exchange?  You would need to buy other investment property but would be able to not pay any taxes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;References : &lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;starker.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your basis in the property will be transferred to the note.  As the note is paid off, you would pay the taxes so your strategy will be effective in deferring the gains.</p>
<p>Have you considered performing a 1031 tax deferred exchange?  You would need to buy other investment property but would be able to not pay any taxes.<br /><b>References : </b><br />starker.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: oodle.us @ 2012-05-22 19:45:49 -->
